So by rights in illgraphicz's case , ALL ROLEX related faces should be removed from all members to be fair? Theres over 90 faces Rolex related at the moment.
IF not , how do they single out which Rolex faces are copyright infringement and gets removed and which ones don't? I honestly cannot see Rolex singling out just a couple faces and not the 90 others.....that would make no since. IF in fact it was Rolex that reported it? And like the corporate law office i used to work at said, it is very very rare for large companies to ever grant 3rd party rights to their logos or brands , so a 3rd party claim would be invalid. They also said IF we are accused of such, we have the legal right to address the accuser (person whom reported copyright infringement).
Im just trying to understand how this works is all. Because I do have alot published and want to fully understand such. Again I dont have problems with faces being removed. In fact i would do it myself if I understood the rules a bit better.
Do we have a list of companies that has given the ok to advertise their brands for them? I was told several other face maker sites do in fact have such a list. And a List of those that has said No would be most helpful also.
So I now am trying to steer clear also of the major brands and such in future faces i make and focusing on learning to make a bit less basic faces and take my time in doing so. FACER is so fun, I guess I sorta got carried away in the beginning with all the basic ones.
Anyways I again state that I respect Facers decision and have faith that they will treat all members fairly in their decisions. And IF any of my faces have to be removed because a verified copyright holder wishes to have it removed, I fully honor that decision.