Salve a tutti. Mi ritrovo un problema: Non riesco a far funzionare una bussola e non ho neanche la più pallida idea di come si comincia. Uso il tag della bussola ma poi??? Qualcuno gentilmente può indirizzarmi sull’operazione?
2 Likes
First of all you watch has to have the compass sensor, which I hope it has…
Then add a compass element and add the rotation: (#-CMP#)
You can find some compass hands, needles here:
3 Likes
Grazie tom.vannes. La bussola dovrei averla nel Ticwatch Smartwatch Pro 3 LTE. Non c’era nel PRO 3, ma nel PRO 3 LTE so che c’è, anche se non la ho mai usata. Del resto c’è anche maps. Provo questa tua formula. Ho scaricato le lancette, aghi e bussole per quando riuscirò a farla partire. Grazie ancora amico.
2 Likes
Tom (-#CMP#) is NOP . -(#CMP) is a worker . For rotating the Dial of the Compass .
2 Likes
This is the correct expression in my eyes.
-(#CMP#) does work but I have no idea why as it breaks the rules of keeping calculated expressions inside brackets. Logically it is equivalent to 0-(#CMP#) which does not work at all where (0-#CMP#) does.
I have always used (-#CMP#) for a rotating bezel compass.
3 Likes
Thanks . I will not corect it but stand corrected . Many just put - outside to invert the rotaton . Should it not Technicaly be (360-(#CMP#)) . We are just lucky that creator handles large numbers under zero .
2 Likes
There is zero point in putting brackets around a single tag so if you mathematically optimise (360-(#CMP#)) it becomes (360-#CMP#). You would not write (360-(30)).
I also find that unnecessary brackets makes the matching, and reading at a glance, all the harder.
As a static point 0 and 360 are interchangeable in the expression as are 270 and -90 etc. The first can be seen either end of the designer slider. It is only the sign before the tag that determines direction of motion.
1 Like
I don’t believe the answer is quite so simple afterall we are dealing with rotary motion where a minus sign is not necessarily mathematic indicator of subtraction but can also be a simple indicator of direction clockwise or anticlockwise.
I also disagree that the use of parentheses can be a problem - i was taught to use them to ensure the order of operators is clear to those reading the calculation in the same way that i was not allowed to do calculations in my head to arrive at an answer- it was necessary to show how i arrived at the answer.
2 Likes
I agree to the extent of separating parts of a calculation. It’s overuse and unnecessary ones I find a problem. (2*3-4) will always be calculated by a language as 2 because order of precedence says so but I would not be overly upset by ((2*3)-4)). I would be aghast to see (((2)*(3))-(4))) however.
2 Likes
Ha Ha . Yes and yes . Sadly in some Syntax we have to put Variables into Parenthesis to force them to be Integers . Otherwise they are strings. We need a good strong topic on Natural Precedence of Operands . Sadly my Brain will not let me Learn it . So I use the KinderGarten Mode .
2 Likes