'Feels like' temperature Formula Help Please

There are tables but the extrapolation relies on exponents. I don’t understand why simple exponents are not part of the expressions outside of exponenting a constant. There is xEy but that is x time 10 to the y

@BIELITZ do you have the source for your original formula?

Also. This became much more fun but may be more than an evening and a deep maths delve into some basic lacks of the expressions and can we, as a team work around them?

The National Weather Service’s formula to calculate wind chill is: 35.74 + 0.6215T – 35.75(V^0.16) + 0.4275T(V^0.16).

That’s Fahrenheit for some really obscure reason but end result is easily converted.

1 Like

I have to admit to being defeated on this one without basic exponent ability within the expressions of x^y.
Maybe @Facer_Official knows something I don’t as to why there is no ability to square, cube or do basic exponentials in the expressions. Maybe there is and it is just not documented?

1 Like

@BIELITZ do you have the source for your original formula?

JAG/TI-2000
https://www.cumuluswiki. org/ a/ Feels_Like
(Delete spaces)

3 Likes

Wind blowing towards the thermometer is an easy fix it’s just the rest… :grinning:

3 Likes

That one still uses to the power of 0.16 and there is no power of in the facer expressions.

Sorry for the delay. 22 police 7 indoors, 2 with riot gear. Paramedics cleared the combatants as OK but both fight drunk in the house downstairs from my room. I tried to offer bottled water but…

1 Like

I think that a police siege to quell riot a floor below me is a perfectly acceptable reason for a delay! :rofl:

It’s starting to look like i will have to use fudgematics to get an approximation of an approximation of ‘feels like’. :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Maybe you can try to use the Australian model for “Apparent temperature”, which also integrates humidity, but uses only operations that we have available in Facers tools set.
It produces slightly different results at some extremes like complete calm but, maybe it is worth a try. It also should work with different temperature array than the Wind chill, which is meant to work best with temperatures close to and below freezing point. You can compare results of the “Wind chill index” by inserting same test values into both calculators.

5 Likes

Hi all
For one, it only makes sense to talk about a chill factor when you have 10°C or less. So that may be a condition you want to consider.
There is an easier formula which is good enough. It is based on a few assumptions, such as being at sea level and humidity is not factored in either.

Formula for Celsius and speed as Kmh:
wind chill = 13.12 + (0.6215 * T) – (11.37 * v * 0.16) + (0.3965 * T * v * 0.16)

Facer Wind speed is in m/s, multiplying that with 3.6 gives you kmh.

Detail reading here.

4 Likes

I looked at this first but couldn’t find a humidity weather tag in Facer either.

2 Likes

Unfortunately I also looked at this one and they forgot to superscript:

  • W = 13.12 + 0.6215 * T – 11.37 * v 0.16 + 0.3965 * T * v0.16
    v0.16 should have the 0.16 as superscript and read as v^0.16 not v*0.16
3 Likes

Ah! OK, thanks. Probably the “back tick” missing on that page when quoting formulas…

4 Likes

#WCHN# Current Humidity Number

4 Likes

Cooking with gas:

Haven’t quite worked it out yet. Been a bit distracted again with unneeded but understandably neccessary post councilling and so on but I have the brackets wrong myself so have a consistant but wrong answer for feels like using the previous: https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/weather-and-climate-from-a-to-z/wind-chill.html

1 Like

will look at that anew tomorrow. Nit sure why I could not see it in the tag list. Cheers

3 Likes

this works for apparent temperature in metric units (round(#WCT#+0.33*#WCHN#/100*6.105*exp(17.27*#WCT#/(237.7+#WCT#))-0.7*#WND#-4)) or
(round(#WCT#+0.0201465*#WCHN#*exp(17.27*#WCT#/(237.7+#WCT#))-0.7*#WND#-4))

And this one seems to work for imperial units setting
(round((((#WCT#-32)*5/9)+0.0201465*#WCHN#*exp(17.27*((#WCT#-32)*5/9)/(237.7+((#WCT#-32)*5/9)))-0.7*#WND#*1.6/3.6-4)*9/5)+32)

3 Likes

@petruuccios Thanks - it works perfectly!
My only problem is how you got to the above from the original formula - could you please give me the original formula so that I can try and see how you got from one to the other?
Thanks again.

1 Like

It comes from the calculator page I suggested earlier, it is also on wikipedia.


I just substituted the vapour pressure with formula for it

2 Likes

it was the water vapour pressure formula and using exp in the tag that fooled me!

thanks again

3 Likes

Do not forget to add formulas for both unit systems and alternate them using #UNITSYS# tag, if you plan on publishing it, or there will be nonsensical results.

2 Likes

Yes indeed - there will be imperial and metric choices. I do intend to publish :grinning:

2 Likes