yeap, and us users PAY money to Facer for premium $4.99/Pro $5.99 features, for what? Half if not ALL the Pro features in the creator doesn’t even work anyway since this new WFF format.
3 Likes
@pinbal24 That is the reason I dropped the Pro upgrade this spring. I got tired of paying money for others who pay money to download my faces for free. I have several unpublished premium faces for my own use, but with WFF that is quickly becoming unusable for me also.
3 Likes
If you get a conversion failure to WFF publishing it reverts the watch to Draft regardless even if it was published successfully previously. Theres an issue publishing to WFF atm. Hope Facer announce when its resolved to the community.
3 Likes
I had one fail to publish to WFF today. I published another, simpler, one and that worked fine. The face that failed had a formula to calculate the number of days until Christmas and also some text with an opacity formula. I removed all three of them, and then it published with no problem. Not sure which of the three was the cause. However, the face does still have six images with formulae for opacity, so clearly they’re okay.
2 Likes
Yes . It seems like Conditional Formulas in the text boxes is an issue at the moment . It seems like everything you put in there is treated as TEXT . I am not sure if simple expressions can be added . Maybe worth a test . I think the countdowns I have seen have been made on WFS .
4 Likes
Strange thing is, as a personal user, it’ll sync to my watch and work without a problem. But it won’t publish. I could spend time publishing three different versions to work out which item causes the problem… but I just published a simpler version and all is well.
2 Likes
At this moment in Facers existence this is the best us makers can Do . The faces that do best In the charts are not always the Gadget Fests . A lot of the users are looking at the Graphics aspect . So Making Great Faces is as much the work on a Graphics package as well .
2 Likes