As I promised the Community . I will try Maintain the list . Some add stuff on I do it myself mainly . Your tool is going to be very useful to test a Chapter of text . Perhaps there should be a Link to your App in the Description of the WiKi .
2 Likes
Yes, feel free to link to the tool in the wiki description if you think it fits or let me know if you’d prefer to add it yourself, or if it’s okay for me to post it there.
https://jjune33.github.io/facer-trademark-checker/
Also, if you’re interested, you’re very welcome to help maintain the list directly via the shared backend (shared Google Sheet connected to git): Can I send a PM on this board with the link (more spam friendly then post it here)? And sorry I am new here , only 2 months into this hobby
2 Likes
Oh I know, I understand. I’m just complaining that Facer’s mechanisms make it too easy for them to zap your face if it innocently intends to say “navigator” as a pilot, whereas if it says “Lincoln Navigator” then obviously that’s a clear infringement that needs to be zapped.
3 Likes
@jivestaroso Please add your Link to the tool you made to the top of the WIKI with a note . I will ask you kindly to maintain Your list yourself . I would ask you that there is Parity and if you find a discrepancy please flag it up . Either one of us can update the WIKI list .
1 Like
It also highlights the absolute redonculous pomposity of it all.
They have chosen to make first claim to a word that literally means: an object surviving from an earlier time, especially one of historical interest.
Companies hijacking common words on a pure language front need to be stopped. I understand the need for brand integrity but does this mean that if someone built a boat in the shape of a watch and named it NAVIGATOR they would have to skuttle it?
1 Like
NAV, Nav seem fine
1 Like