thank you it works I had tried with && but I did not think to reverse the contrast thank you
1 Like
&& || grown up conditional stuff you must take care to not use too many on one line .
Very wise words.
1 Like
Hello I solicit you again because I would like to know how to make the turn of my dial to my second hand in 1 second
I tried this formula but it does not work
(#DWFSS#)*1
1 Like
I think you mean
#DWFS#
So just delete one S and you wil get nice 1 second tick. My favourite.
That was my first question when I came to Facer.
If that is not what you meant come back.
I’m having trouble expressing myself, I want my second hand to make a complete turn in 1 sec but in a smooth way
1 Like
1 Like
roughly multiplied the rotation time
1 Like
OK that is fast. Normally the second Hand travels 6 degrees per second. So I suppose if you multiplied #DWFSS# by 60 you would get what you want.
((#DWFSS#)*60)
Try make your links Inspectable. Looks to me like you are using a progress.
The maths there is different. The Fill is a fractional. So 0 to 1.
Bit late for me right now.
We will sort it.
1 Like
thank you it’s perfect
2 Likes
Obviously that formula is very crude and over runs to give you a massive number after a minute. 360x*60. But we are allowed to get away with that on Facer. Ther are other more elegant ways of doing these things.
We’ll done I see you have gone for something less fast than 1 revolution per second. : )
1 Like
I understand.
Yes in the creator it seemed my fast but on the watch it was too much so I opted for a turn in 5sec
A big thank you to the community
2 Likes
Timing in the creator has become bettetr but syncing and testing on a watch is the only true way to ensure the expression is good.
1 Like
Sequential animations are impossible on Creator. I often send a face to my watch and not bother for the further testing. Just save it and look the face up on my phone in Watch box. It is at the top of the list because I synced it. Most of what I do can be tested in that preview namely accelerometerRawY() stuff. Most sequence animation stuff can be preview there. Some times Arc Progress stuff is messed up but save loads of Syncs to the watch. I am surprised I have not killed it with all the traffic through the EEPROM.
Hello to all I come back to you because I would like to have a single decimal after the vigula for my conversion of steps in distance I use this formula
$#UNITSYS#=IMPERIAL?(floor(#ZSC# * 0.621371 * 0.65/10)/100): (floor(#ZSC# * 0.65/10)/100)$
Using this formula I also have a slight difference with the distance displayed on samsung health example:
For 1076 steps facer shows me 0.69 km
While samsung health shows me 0.71km
And the gap is widening
1 Like
So your two Distances are as close as I would expect. Remember Facer Does not know your Bio Metrics as well as your Phone / Watch. I think the results you have are pretty good. The real answer is probably somewhere between the two. I will have a look ay you decimal place when the Laptop is ON.
I modified the formula
$#UNITSYS#=IMPERIAL?(floor( #ZSC # * 0.621371 * 0.65/10)/100): (floor( #ZSC # * 0.66/10)/100)$
And here I fall just to see if a gap appears in the thread of the steps
1 Like
I have been having a look at his . I use a few more brackets than most . I see nothing wrong with your formula bar that .
((floor(((#ZSC#)*0.65)/100))/10)
I am no sure about your MPH conversion it is very complicated . Find a conversion number and use that rather than the long form maths .
Try
$#UNITSYS#=IMPERIAL?(floor((#ZSC#)*(0.621371*0.66)/100)/10):(floor(((#ZSC#)*0.66)/100)/10)$
To protect your cod being corrupted by Facer during Uploading select you code and click </> on the Text Format Options above .
I see you changed on of your conversions but not Both . Have a look at a few and see what the consensus is . There are lots of Ideas about which is the correct number
Thank you, it seems to work well, I will test it on the long term and see if the distance remains ok.
1 Like
Pleasure As we go on making Faces for Ourselves we can get the Biometrics right by using other things like Strava or Google to work out how far we have walked . These things can only be reasonably accurate . It is for comparison to the previous day .