Publish premium design failed

Support
1

Hello,

I am a Pro subscriber and I have tried several times to publish a premium analog watch face design, but each attempt ends with a “Publishing Failed” notification.

All compatibility checks are marked with green checkmarks, and the only progress bar expressions used in the design are:

(clamp(#ZHR#, 0,200)/375)
(clamp(#ZSC#,0,10000)/19000)

Do you see anything in these expressions or the watch face configuration that might need to be corrected?

Or is there currently a known issue with publishing watch faces to Wear OS (WFF)?

Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to your feedback.

Best regards,

2

I know of limitations. For example

  • if you have multiple expression in different fields of 1 element
  • making the font size dependent on something like ZSC>9999, does not work.
  • or having complicated nested expression in a text field may also work.
  • or using DWE in an expression the pre check cannot detect.

Best would be to open up inspection, give us the link of your unpublished face, and people here can have a look…

1 Like
3

The first thing I see is that Facer doesn’t like spaces in expressions.

2 Likes
4

@terzydesign Hi . I was working in a ting with #ZHR# on it . and it has picked up Hiddent errors . Sometimes we have to start the Layers from scratch . I try using lots of () for solutions . I know it is childish but sometimes it works .
TRY
((clamp(#ZHR#,0,200))/375)

You could just devide #ZHR# by 375 to get the same result as far as I can see .

That Formula above published fine standing alone .
.

fine
fine887×637 60.2 KB

1 Like
5

77 bpm? You’re officially in relax mode.

1 Like
6

Yes . He He . I dont understand the devide by 375 .

1 Like
7

I was thinking about that also, I suspct that it may be intended for a circular progress element or fill meter with limited arc range.

2 Likes
8

here with my unpublished face link

Please let me know which part, make it error

9

hmmm… I do not really see anything wrong.
Except the battery progress: (#BLN#/125)100
The 100 should not be there.

You could also try changing battery text
from : #BLN#%
to : #BLP#

The “%” could be interpreted as the modulo function

1 Like
10

I think it should be there in place of the 125

1 Like