Just out of curiosity: Is there a formula for the smooth second hand movement?
I know we have the built-in one but how would you make it yourself?
Just out of curiosity: Is there a formula for the smooth second hand movement?
I know we have the built-in one but how would you make it yourself?
#DWFSS# is the smooth movement.
I know:P
But if it wasn’t there, what would the formula look like?
((#Dsm#)*6)
you could try
(((#DNOW#)%60000)*6)
The first one works but it is way laggier than the built in one.
Did you try the second formula? It certainly speeds up your second hand.
Ha Ha No sorry they were from the top of my head . Did you look at #DNOW# as it is . The Guys who kick started Facer used that for everything like the Moon Phases and stuff.
So sorry @juni00 . Shows you how well I remember this stuff . It is a favourite Timer of mine because it will not cross Zero for about 15 Years .We will get a jump then . This works but you probably got there yourself .
(((#DNOW#/1000)%60)*6)
This one works just fine but it gives no benefits over the built-in #DWFSS#.
It is a bit weird. Has anyone figured out why the smooth second hand movement isn’t really smooth but mostly just a hacking movement? In some watch faces it works great but others it just hacks. It seems like it is somehow connected to to adding a date display - but other times not.
A hacking movement is sort of realistic for analog watches but still, I’d like a consistent smooth movement.
Maybe it just is my watch but I do have the flagship Samsung 5 Pro.
I wear a Face that I made that has a lot of Stuff on it. Quite near the limit of what works properly. I have tried a smooth second hand on it but that Hacks as you say, so I go back to the Dead Beat. I actualy like the stepped one. Half and quarter ticks can look nice. There are some nice Tension Ones about that sort of cover the Hacking. I think it depends what else is going on in the watch. The use of Motion Detectection is causing problems for me at the moment.