Just out of curiosity: Is there a formula for the smooth second hand movement?
I know we have the built-in one but how would you make it yourself?
Just out of curiosity: Is there a formula for the smooth second hand movement?
I know we have the built-in one but how would you make it yourself?
#DWFSS# is the smooth movement.
I know:P
But if it wasn’t there, what would the formula look like?
((#Dsm#)*6)
you could try
(((#DNOW#)%60000)*6)
The first one works but it is way laggier than the built in one.
Did you try the second formula? It certainly speeds up your second hand. ![]()
Ha Ha No sorry they were from the top of my head . Did you look at #DNOW# as it is . The Guys who kick started Facer used that for everything like the Moon Phases and stuff.
So sorry @juni00 . Shows you how well I remember this stuff . It is a favourite Timer of mine because it will not cross Zero for about 15 Years .We will get a jump then . This works but you probably got there yourself .
(((#DNOW#/1000)%60)*6)
This one works just fine but it gives no benefits over the built-in #DWFSS#.
It is a bit weird. Has anyone figured out why the smooth second hand movement isn’t really smooth but mostly just a hacking movement? In some watch faces it works great but others it just hacks. It seems like it is somehow connected to to adding a date display - but other times not.
A hacking movement is sort of realistic for analog watches but still, I’d like a consistent smooth movement.
Maybe it just is my watch but I do have the flagship Samsung 5 Pro.
I wear a Face that I made that has a lot of Stuff on it. Quite near the limit of what works properly. I have tried a smooth second hand on it but that Hacks as you say, so I go back to the Dead Beat. I actualy like the stepped one. Half and quarter ticks can look nice. There are some nice Tension Ones about that sort of cover the Hacking. I think it depends what else is going on in the watch. The use of Motion Detectection is causing problems for me at the moment.