I am working on a watch face with a tourbillon hour hand and a large retrograde minute hand. I am using the expression (490 + (#DWFMS#/ 360 * 260)) and it works fine for 0 - 30 minutes, but then goes wrong.
You can do it with two hands hiding the one that has gone off track . You can use a non liner formula involving sin and rad or you can look at a +/- formula and use abs in it . I will have a look after Dinner . That particular hand is not best for stretching as it will change shape.
.
This is a very crude solution following on from your Liner Concept . I found the scale you have a bit misleading . Going from 0 to 55 . Well if you wanted to run it in 5 minute steps that would be fine .
I will have a look at a non liner but someone might get there before me .
BTW I used the Minute hand for this test .
The curve looks elliptic, so using the the formula for an elliptical path, the formula for the height would be (used seconds for easy simulation, you can change to minutes):
(468/(sqrt(1-0.36*sin(rad(#DWFSS#/2)))))
I am assuming 220 degrees path as opposed to @russellcresser - makes it a little easier with the formulas.
So the rotation is: (220-(((#DWFSS#)/(360/80))))
The Hand details (using the standard one in your diagram):
X: 160
Y: 17
Width: (146/(sqrt(1-0.36*sin(rad(#DWFSS#/2)))))
This width makes the hand look proportionate all the time, although it only varies between 146 and 182.
Looking forward to checking that out Tom . When I am simulating angles I use #DWFHS# . Then I can use the time machine slider . I some times use it for positions stuff as well and Write the numbers down for later .
I’ve just been making my hour and minute retrograde scales portions of circles. As an example:
Changing the hand length is an interesting option. Somebody must have a hand that spirals outward for some purpose. I know I’ve seen spiral scales for some sort of purpose. Looks like tachymeter or just hours and minutes depending on the watch.
I have a few . My Maths is not strong I have to split the problem up . However We will soon have some of the masters show up and do it in one line . You must be a little more specific . I am not sure exactly what you want to do .
.
I have a few . My Maths is not strong I have to split the problem up . However We will soon have some of the masters show up and do it in one line . You must be a little more specific . I am not sure exactly what you want to do .
.
Thought you would be for the win on this one. I remember the back and forth on some of the formula as I tried to keep up without trying it personally (the only real way to ingrain).