Trying to control opacity from multiple toggles

General
1

I have 3 toggles for complications and want the hands to temporarily disappear for each toggle. What am I doing wrong here?

$#VAR_1_TE#>0&&#VAR_1_TE#<3000?0:100$$#VAR_2_TE#>0&&#VAR_2_TE#<3000?0:100$$#VAR_3_TE#>0&&#VAR_3_TE#<3000?0:100$

2

You are going to have to split them up into three seperate expressions. Use one in opacity, one in the X-Box to slide it off screen to the right and the third in the Y-Box to throw it off screen to the bottom. Then all three will work independently from each other.

3

OK, bummer. Thanks for the info.

4

How about for moving it off screen but not instant like this,

$#VAR_1_TE#>0&&#VAR_1_TE#<1000?160:-10$

take a second to go off, then a second to go on?

5

I’ve only used #VAR_1# style in all of my expressions, I have no idea how #VAR_1_TE# is going to react. That is if it even works like you are expecting.

6

#VAR_1_TE# is like a timer so as above if time is greater than 0 but less than 1 second the location is 160, otherwise it’s -10

1 Like
7

So @mmoore410 If its a hand you want to dismiss using position you will have to send further than -10 . I will look at the code Up Top . I have done a little T and TE stuff using it for Pseudo Random as a matter of interest . Another way to dismiss stuff is zero size it .

8

Hey I hadn’t thought of the zero sizing, thanks russellcresser. The -10 is just an example. But do you have any thoughts on using the var toggle to move it offscreen and then back on but taking a second or so to do it?

1 Like
9

This works fine I just do not understand why you want 3 opacity conditions on one line . Have a look at the test and see if it fits otherwise get back .
I think Facer are working with the Tags and expressions on a continuous basis . If you have a problem one day and it is sorted the next . My Moto is Keep it as simple as Possible .

10

Ah, you’re using increments, I was using toggles.

1 Like
11

Hello, I guess you are using the right tag…
#VAR_1_TE# Elapsed time (in ms) since the interactive variable was last updated
Try this for the hands opacity:
(100*(#VAR_1_TE#>3000)*(#VAR_2_TE#>3000)*(#VAR_3_TE#>3000))
On my gear S3 with Tizen 2.3.2.3 it works as you described in first post

1 Like
12

Yes! Thank You!! works perfect

1 Like
13

Yeah. You would think it was a Toggle. Have Fun.