Content pulled for copyright infringement

Then some of your 20’s items may be antiques, once you cross the 99-year point!

1 Like

that’s right.

i like art deco, the bauhaus and the “modern” design that came out of it.
That’s why many of my ideas for watches are inspired by it.

3 Likes

One of my originals is inspired by art deco.

4 Likes

The theme is implemented well.
All elements are clean and authentically worked.
Stylish and classy…
That’s how I perceive the design of the era.
I personally would like the numbers to be a little smaller.
But every artist can and should implement his design the way he feels.

When I see that, I want to make a face with the typical stylized sunrise. :wink:

2 Likes

Between the octagon shape and the shield emblem in the center, that makes that face just shout out Art Deco.

3 Likes

I put a bit more in the corners in case of a square watch.

3 Likes

I just published a fully “named” recreated design-- for which I have written permission from its trademark owner. I wonder how long before I get harassed! :face_with_hand_over_mouth: :rofl:

The most stunning design I have seen yet. A 52mm pocket watch from 1904, made by PWC for the Sears catalog.

5 Likes

written permission …
So this should be something very rare here :wink:

I like the work very much

3 Likes

I think you did the right thing by stating in the description that you have published it with their permission.

4 Likes

I just got bitten by a false-positive/mistaken identity: the system thinks this 1970’s Soviet chronograph designed by the First Moscow Watch Factory “may be infringing on the copyrights or trademarks of these brands: Tissot.:roll_eyes:

image

1 Like

I think the Bot is Paranoid .

1 Like

I don’t think the bots ever flag graphics, it’s just keywords. So likely either the name of your watch or some word you put in the description was the trigger.

2 Likes

The bot is both paranoid and prickly.

Although my intention was to use it as a word and not a name (not that it would make a difference), I missed “navigator” being on the list of banned words. The bot didn’t like “first class navigator’s badge:roll_eyes: :neutral_face: :face_with_symbols_over_mouth:

Furthermore, you prickly bot, NAVIGATOR is not a trademark. I looked it up: TISSOT NAVIGATOR is the trademark. :roll_eyes: :neutral_face: :face_with_symbols_over_mouth:

3 Likes

We will have to club Together to get Marvin some lessons in English OH and all the other Languages on the Planet .

1 Like

Words of normal usage should always be excluded from such automatic sorting.
Something like that really brings the artists into disrepute and causes unnecessary trouble.
To put it briefly … the programming is just shit and should be revised urgently.

2 Likes

You should address that comment to @Facer_Official . We all live with these Quirks in the System . Those of us that are enjoying Facer for Free can not really Bitch about it . However those who are adding to the Profits have a good point . I see Facer keep advertising for people to work for them . I wonder if that means no one is interested .

2 Likes

that’s a damn good question

3 Likes

So I took their “appeal” route and explained (or at least tried to) that this has nothing to do with Tissot and that I was using the word navigator referring to an aircraft pilot. I hope I didn’t open a can of worms. :neutral_face:

2 Likes

Let us have a look at the worms when the Can is Open. :joy::slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

Welcome in the club! Some of my faces are deleted because “oyster perpetual” words was in description… Rolex is the prime evil… so there is a topic about the banned words, we have some strange and bad expirience about it…

2 Likes