Then some of your 20’s items may be antiques, once you cross the 99-year point!
that’s right.
i like art deco, the bauhaus and the “modern” design that came out of it.
That’s why many of my ideas for watches are inspired by it.
One of my originals is inspired by art deco.
The theme is implemented well.
All elements are clean and authentically worked.
Stylish and classy…
That’s how I perceive the design of the era.
I personally would like the numbers to be a little smaller.
But every artist can and should implement his design the way he feels.
When I see that, I want to make a face with the typical stylized sunrise.
Between the octagon shape and the shield emblem in the center, that makes that face just shout out Art Deco.
I put a bit more in the corners in case of a square watch.
I just published a fully “named” recreated design-- for which I have written permission from its trademark owner. I wonder how long before I get harassed!
The most stunning design I have seen yet. A 52mm pocket watch from 1904, made by PWC for the Sears catalog.
written permission …
So this should be something very rare here
I like the work very much
I think you did the right thing by stating in the description that you have published it with their permission.
I just got bitten by a false-positive/mistaken identity: the system thinks this 1970’s Soviet chronograph designed by the First Moscow Watch Factory “may be infringing on the copyrights or trademarks of these brands: Tissot.”
I think the Bot is Paranoid .
I don’t think the bots ever flag graphics, it’s just keywords. So likely either the name of your watch or some word you put in the description was the trigger.
The bot is both paranoid and prickly.
Although my intention was to use it as a word and not a name (not that it would make a difference), I missed “navigator” being on the list of banned words. The bot didn’t like “first class navigator’s badge”
Furthermore, you prickly bot, NAVIGATOR is not a trademark. I looked it up: TISSOT NAVIGATOR is the trademark.
We will have to club Together to get Marvin some lessons in English OH and all the other Languages on the Planet .
Words of normal usage should always be excluded from such automatic sorting.
Something like that really brings the artists into disrepute and causes unnecessary trouble.
To put it briefly … the programming is just shit and should be revised urgently.
You should address that comment to @Facer_Official . We all live with these Quirks in the System . Those of us that are enjoying Facer for Free can not really Bitch about it . However those who are adding to the Profits have a good point . I see Facer keep advertising for people to work for them . I wonder if that means no one is interested .
that’s a damn good question
So I took their “appeal” route and explained (or at least tried to) that this has nothing to do with Tissot and that I was using the word navigator referring to an aircraft pilot. I hope I didn’t open a can of worms.
Let us have a look at the worms when the Can is Open.
Welcome in the club! Some of my faces are deleted because “oyster perpetual” words was in description… Rolex is the prime evil… so there is a topic about the banned words, we have some strange and bad expirience about it…