No, that certainly didn’t apply to you. It just turned out that I was being addressed by a kind of collective partner, so it was difficult for me to maintain a dialogue with someone in particular so that they would understand that I was not talking about them specifically. Damn, this is long and torturous. More morality and purity-of-language advocates are coming, and I’m going to need doping.
It will be good if some practical changes begin, rather than a position on some list kept by who knows who and where.
I think this whole thing started because you sold your opinions and beliefs as facts, which, without having a look at the code behind all this, can never be facts… It’s all just theory until there is proof.
That’s why it was an opinion from my experience and people can judge for themselves. I didn’t sell anything. I believe them to be true, it’s up to others to come to their own conclusion. What the hell proof have you or any other “partner” given?? None, Zero, Zilch, Nada… To me, it’s a rigged system. Period.
Is that really what you want? Describe the system, what should the top 100 look like if it works the way you described. What can happen during the week starting Sunday and what can’t happen if you stick to your theory
I think it would be interesting if there was simply a sync count added to the display of the top 100. One of the questions asked way way upstream was how many syncs might a face in the top of the charts have. I think whatever # is used by the algorithm could be displayed. So that’s presumably the # of syncs since the last Sunday, not all-time cumulative syncs.