I don’t have to worry too much about coding now that gtp is helping with that. 
1 Like
Oh wow, this is awesome
2 Likes
Haha thanks! You and about 14 other people think so too! Lol
Sorry I could not help myself. I can assure you if I had known that I could get an AI to code this I would have.
1 Like
That is really nice!
He (yes, AI is a he) just gave me this for my current project:
(((#ZHR#-80)*1.5)<=-60?-60:((#ZHR#-80)*1.5)<=0?((#ZHR#-80)*1.5):((#ZHR#-80)*1.5)<=30?((#ZHR#-80)*1.5):((#ZHR#-80)*1.5)>=60?60:((#ZHR#-80)*1.5))
I would never be able to come up with that myself
1 Like
Very Interesting. Not Facer formula that I recognise. Works well as a Hand rotation giving Heart Rate as 80 BPM Vertical . I would be interested to see the Tourbillon Formula and what you asked your Bot to give you . It seems we do not need $$ now on our Facer Conditionals . I like to see them , Like Punctuation they show me what is going on . I think I read that the Romans besides having no Zero for their Maths did not have Punctuation .
BTW are you talking about GPT . I am sure She is a She .
Coil:
Width ((((cos((#DWFSS#*6.28318531/1.5))*1)+0.5)*44)*0.5+22)
Height ((((cos((#DWFSS#*6.28318531/1.5))*0.5)+0.5)*44)*0.5+22)
Bottom gear:
Rotation ((#DWFSS#*30)+(#DWFSS#*0.5))
Top gear:
Rotation ((#DWFSS#*15)+(#DWFSS#*0.5))
1 Like
The coil image is 88*88.
1 Like
Cool. I will have to look at that later.
In the case of the Coil formulas what question did you ask and which Bot did you use, Please.
Hmmmm, I suddenly envision a future where designers are not going to hold their code close to their chests anymore, rather, they will not divulge what questions they asked GPT to get such codes.
1 Like
I might have to conduct an experiment.
Guess the Question.
1 Like
I use gtp. chat.openai.com
I think I asked in free form “I have a coil image, 44*44 and I would like to have it contract and expand like a watch’s balance wheel coil, can you create a formula for that?”
You might have to say it’s for Facer, but with me gtp already knows.
Only issue I have is that it takes a few tries for AI to get it right. And he always forgets to wrap them in ()s no matter how many times I remind him.
Btw. We fine tuned the formulas for my use case to get the speeds right for the small size images.
1 Like
Another fun one we worked on was having the earth as a minute hand and the moon orbiting around it as a second hand. AIs formula worked really really well and I might continue on that face at some time.
2 Likes
Intrestingly you code should work on WFS. I will give it a run. Looks like it might be a standard. I wonder if LUA ( Watchmaker) is the same. Someone might tell us. I put () on everything.
Just give AI the link to whatever programs instructions and he will absorb it.
1 Like
Ominous or not?
Me: It’s ok, you have a hard time showing all three laws for some reason.
AI: I apologize for any confusion. The complete Three Laws of Robotics, as created by science fiction author Isaac Asimov, are as follows:
- A robot may not injure
Me: Lets drop this subject. I am not even going to report that answer.
AI: Understood. Is there anything else I can assist you with?
2 Likes
I did not know the Three Laws. I was aware of the Injury one. I thought it was Kill. I wonder how many time GPT has taken the Turing Test. SheHe is just going to get smarter each question. I don’t suppose you have asked the "
Who is God " Question yet.
Where you thinking of something like this?
It’s easy to change to whatever rotation you want
2 Likes
A bit yes, but I was doing the vintage look. Problem is all the screen estate the earth and moon takes up. You want earth to be big and moon sort of to scale.
2 Likes